Neurofibromatosis Society of Ontario

It spent $39,170 more than it took in, drawing down the difference. Neither is good or bad on its own — charities hold reserves, run capital campaigns, and spend down endowments, and the return does not say which.

This charity did not report a breakdown of its spending.

That is a normal and permitted way to file — the CRA return lets smaller charities complete a simplified section. It is not a sign of anything, and it does not mean the charity spent nothing on these things.

Neurofibromatosis Society of Ontario reported spending 78.1% of its expenditure on charitable programs. Among the 2,512 charities registered under core health care that reported the same line for 2018, the middle of the range is 85.2%, and this charity sits at the 37th percentile — below 63% of them.

That is a position in a distribution, not a verdict. Charities allocate costs differently on the same form, and a lower share often reflects how a return was filled in rather than how the money was spent. The cohort counts only charities that reported this line — about a quarter of the register does not, and they are not in the comparison at all.