Animal Lifeline Emergency Response Team Society

It took in $105,167 more than it spent, and retained the difference. Neither is good or bad on its own — charities hold reserves, run capital campaigns, and spend down endowments, and the return does not say which.

This charity did not report a breakdown of its spending.

That is a normal and permitted way to file — the CRA return lets smaller charities complete a simplified section. It is not a sign of anything, and it does not mean the charity spent nothing on these things.

Animal Lifeline Emergency Response Team Society reported spending 27.2% of its expenditure on charitable programs. Among the 808 charities registered under animal welfare that reported the same line for 2022, the middle of the range is 90.6%, and this charity sits at the 7th percentile — below 93% of them.

That is a position in a distribution, not a verdict. Charities allocate costs differently on the same form, and a lower share often reflects how a return was filled in rather than how the money was spent. The cohort counts only charities that reported this line — about a quarter of the register does not, and they are not in the comparison at all.