Loading this charity’s filing…
Loading this charity’s filing…
$500,418
$493,966
It took in $6,452 more than it spent, and retained the difference. Neither is good or bad on its own — charities hold reserves, run capital campaigns, and spend down endowments, and the return does not say which.
| Year | Money in | Money out |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | $515K | $514K |
| 2018 | $795K | $747K |
| 2019 | $423K | $386K |
| 2020 | $355K | $328K |
| 2021 | $463K | $479K |
| 2022 | $363K | $330K |
| 2023 | $499K | $402K |
| 2024 | $500K | $494K |
| What it went on | CRA line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charitable programs | 5000 | $338,554 | — |
| Management and administration | 5010 | $66,737 | — |
| Fundraising | 5020 | $88,675 | — |
| Total expenditures excluding gifts | 4950 | $155,412 |
This filing does not add up. The reported components come to $493,966, more than the $155,412 total they are supposed to be part of, so no proportional breakdown is shown. The figures above are exactly as the charity filed them. This is a data-entry problem in the return, and not in itself a finding about the organisation.
It reported giving $338,554 to other qualified donees — registered charities and similar organisations. This sits outside the breakdown above, which covers the charity’s own spending. Line 5050.
La fondation des écoles JPPS-Bialik reported spending 217.8% of its expenditure on charitable programs. Among the 510 charities registered under foundations advancing education that reported the same line for 2024, the middle of the range is 81.5%, and this charity sits at the 96th percentile — above 96% of them.
That is a position in a distribution, not a verdict. Charities allocate costs differently on the same form, and a lower share often reflects how a return was filled in rather than how the money was spent. The cohort counts only charities that reported this line — about a quarter of the register does not, and they are not in the comparison at all.
Canadian charities report how many of their ten highest-paid positions fall in each pay band. Not who they are, and not what any one person earns — the return does not collect that, and it cannot be worked out from what follows.
1 position reported in total. The form asks only about the ten highest-paid, so a smaller number means the charity reported fewer compensated positions than that.
| Permanent full-time positions | 300 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Total spent on all compensation | 390 | $74,692 |
Charities that hold significant property not used in their programs must spend a minimum amount each year — the disbursement quota. La fondation des écoles JPPS-Bialik files this schedule; most charities do not.
| Required to spend | 840 | $11,368 |
|---|---|---|
| Counted toward the quota | 860 | $677,108 |
| Difference | 865 | $665,740 above the quota |
Charities may also carry a disbursement excess forward for five years, so a single year is a slice of a longer calculation rather than the whole of it.
The most recent return this charity has filed — not its position today. Charities have six months to file and the CRA publishes annually.
These are the charity’s own figures. A surprising figure is at least as likely to be a filing error as a finding.
This site cannot confirm whether 891528945 RR 0001 is registered today. Its filings are public open data; current registration status is not, and the CRA’s own listing is the only authoritative source. Check this charity on the CRA Charities Listing.
Source: Canada Revenue Agency — List of charities (T3010). Data current as of 2024 filing year. Filed by the charity and not audited by the CRA. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Canada.